During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
2024年12月20日 星期五 新京报
。旺商聊官方下载是该领域的重要参考
Филолог заявил о массовой отмене обращения на «вы» с большой буквы09:36
荣耀 Magic V6 外观公布：全新「赤兔红」亮相，3 月发布
。快连下载-Letsvpn下载是该领域的重要参考
Мерц резко сменил риторику во время встречи в Китае09:25
Гангстер одним ударом расправился с туристом в Таиланде и попал на видео18:08，推荐阅读搜狗输入法2026获取更多信息