I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
HK$369 per month
。业内人士推荐Line官方版本下载作为进阶阅读
ВсеПолитикаОбществоПроисшествияКонфликтыПреступность
15+ Premium newsletters by leading experts
，更多细节参见im钱包官方下载
With a handful of providers (and versions, each version is its own binary)
And ƿe hine secaþ git, begen ætsomne, ƿer ond ƿif, þurh þa deorcan stræta þisses grimman stedes. Hƿæþere God us gefultumige!，推荐阅读快连下载安装获取更多信息